General Meeting Information
Date: February 12,
2024
Time: 2:30-4:30 PM
Location: MLC 255
This meeting will be held HyFlex, meaning anyone can participate in-person or online. To join remotely, see the Zoom information at the bottom of this page.
-
Agenda
Time Topic Purpose Discussion Leader I. Call to Order
2:30 Welcome
Voting and Associate members joining us online, please turn your cameras on and add "VM" to your zoom name to help identify you to the public.I All 2:30-2:35 Approval of Agenda and Minutes from February 5, 2024 I/D/A All 2:35-2:40 Public Comment
I All II. Consent Calendar
2:40 Approval of Consent Calendar
I/D/A Guitron III. Needs and Confirmations
2:40 District and College Needs (Attachment)
I/D Guitron 2:40 Confirmations (Attachment)
I/D/A Guitron IV. New & Continuing Business
2:40-2:50 Report from DASG I/D Wong 2:50-3:10 COOL Committee Proposal (first read)
I/D Landefeld 3:10-4:10 Training and Support for RSI/Online Teaching: Developing a model
De Anza Online Ed: Online Training Certification Proposal
Online Ed Training ProposalOther relevant links:
A copy of the online training survey for colleges across the state
the CVC-OEI rubric
Foothill's agreed upon proposalI/D Woodbury 4:10-4:20 Good of the Order
I All 4:25 Adjournment
A = Action
D = Discussion
I = Information -
Minutes
I. Call to Order
Welcome
Erik Woodbury reminded voting members to submit their request to attend form by Thursday for their names and locations to be included on the agenda. Those attending within the district will be counted toward quorum and can vote in the meeting.
Approval of Agenda and Minutes from February 5, 2024
Mary Donahue moved, Ravjeet Singh seconded to approve both minutes and agenda. No objection.
Agenda and minutes approved by unanimous consent.
Public Comment
No comments.
II. Consent Calendar
No consent calendar items.
III. Needs and Confirmation
District and College Needs (Attachment)
EAC (Equity Action Council): Need 1 more Faculty Representative. There are already 2 on the council. The Equity Action Council meets on the first and third Wednesday of each month, from 2:30-4p.m. Meetings are currently being held via Zoom.
AS Scholarship Committee: Need more committee members to assist with the reading of scholarship applications.
EO Representatives: As many as possible.
Academic Senate Local GE Committee Still need more reps.
Confirmations (Attachment)
Local GE Committee
Faculty Volunteers
Dave Capitolo, Applied Technologies, Auto Tech
Marc Coronado, IIS, Women and Gender Studies
Barbara Dahlke, General Counselor
Hua-Fu Liu, IIS, Mandarin
Mary Pape, BCAT, CIS
Jayanti Roy, Social Sciences, Child Development
Ravjeet Singh, Social Sciences, Economics
Discussion
James Tallent asked if the representation is limited to one per division.
Catherina Wong: The most impacted areas may have up to 2 representatives.
James Tallent moved to confirm all the above volunteers, LK Sengupta seconded.
Erik Woodbury called for additional nominations from the room.
From Mark Landefeld in chat: There are some volunteers from PE as of today.
Volunteers will need to submit the request to serve form. The Senate will confirm additional volunteers in the next meeting.
Erik asked if there was objection to the motion. No objections. All those above were appointed to the committee.
Committee members and volunteers should consult the Proposed Timeline and Meeting Agenda in this Attachment
This committee will focus on updates to the De Anza local GE pattern to comply with the new Title V requirements.
IV. New & Continuing Business
Report from DASG
Lydia Wong: DASG is in the budget deliberation process. Election for executive positions later this month.They are working on a shared governance news center. Mini flea market tomorrow in addition to the regular flea market on the First Saturday of each month. Valentine's event. Resource Fair, Thursday, Conference rooms A&B. They are working on programs like counseling in the mental health and wellness center.
COOL Committee Proposal (first read)
The De Anza COOL Committee was proposed to replace the Online Advisory Group.
James Capurso introduced the DA Cool Proposal
COOL stands for Committee of Online Learning. The proposal listed other names for consideration and discussion. It is different from the Foothill COOL committee which has given De Anza their blessing to use the name.
James went over the Mission Statement, the Charge, the Leadership for COOL as explained in the proposal.
COOL will be a standing subcommittee under the Academic Senate similar to the curriculum committee, with a particular focus on online learning. It could potentially take over some of the duties of curriculum with respect to the online hybrid forms, and suggestions around online education.
Some people like this plan since faculty will be reviewing the hybrid and online form and giving feedback.
Teaching Hyflex. It is more complicated than a hybrid modality. The committee will need to work on the definition of Hyflex and determine the need for more Hyflex classrooms set up with the required technology.. The 2 existing Hyflex rooms have to be fully utilized before they will budget for more rooms.
Brainstorm ideas for committee representation.
Idea 1: Representation by as many divisions as possible, ideally, one per division
Idea 2: One representative from each village.
Idea 3: Representative by % of online classes taught.
There was also a question and suggestion for student representation.
Some people favored representation by villages that required as many people yet still have comprehensive distribution across different areas.
Some advocated division representation since each discipline has distinctly different requirements. Also, include student representation and representation from student services for different perspectives. There is merit in providing a greater range of expertise and experiences.
In terms of timeline, the forming of the COOL committee will take the rest of the quarter.
Shagun Kaur: How will it work with the Technology committee on campus? Are we focusing on training and pedagogy as opposed to tools and technology?
Mary Pape: The Technology Committee oversees technology on campus, both hardware software and implementation.COOL committee is different from the technology committee.
Shagun Kaur perceived some overlaps between the two committees. She felt strongly that the evaluation for and decisions campus wide technology should go through faculty with a faculty perspective.
But there are also technology decisions made at the district level that faculty have no control over.
Distinction between the two committee
The Technology Committee deals with facilities, budgets, and operational recommendations.
COOL makes recommendations specifically with respect to academic and professional matters.
James Capurso continued to pointing out charge #3 in the proposal where COOL will research, evaluate and communicate to the campus about current and emerging online educational technologies and pedagogy to foster innovation and engagement within the De Anza community on these topics.
Mary Donahue asked about funding for technologies to help instructors with closed captioning, a service that is no longer available. Some instructors are spending a lot of time manually making closed caption materials for use in their online classes.
One of the close caption services is no longer available, they are looking for other options for instructors.
The Senate will continue this discussion and perhaps approve this proposal in three weeks.
Erik encouraged everyone to reach out to their constituencies to communicate and get feedback on the ideas. Also, find if anyone may be interested in getting involved.
Leave comments on the document. Contact officers with questions or concerns.
Training and Support for RSI/Online Teaching: Developing a model
In two weeks, the DA Academic Senate and the Foothill Academic Senate will meet jointly to compare and discuss their respective proposals and recommendations for RSI and online teaching.
The De Anza Senate has been working on the Online Teaching Support and Training document attached above.
Erik has updated the document with feedback from Senate discussions and comments in the document. He suggested that people review the document before the joint meeting.
James Capurso provided some more information on online training certifications as described in the De Anza Online Ed: Online Training Certification Proposal
He followed up on previous discussion on “testing out” and alternative training/certification. He expanded on the classes that could meet the requirements for same or similar learning outcomes.
James will be working on a comprehensive list as part of the discussion in COOL.
He also mentioned POCR (Peer Online Course Review) as an option for training and developing a course.
Cheryl Chapman shared a module prototype for one of the proposed modules. It was a model for the10 hour module on RSI and Communication.
The Senate will have to approve the training requirement before the FA negotiates for/compensation.
Some classes like Comm studies and CIS are 100% hybrid or online.Accessibility is new; there is a lot to learn.
For instructors with no online classes, they may pick and choose what they would like to learn. They can get all of the content with no homework.
James Tallent asked how someone could get certified as a POCR reviewer.
The POCR certification course is provided by @One. James Capurso is going through the training for certification.
Good of the Order
Mary Donahue shared a message from the Red Cross.
Please pass on to your students
"Over the last 20 years, the number of people donating blood to the Red Cross has fallen by more than 40%. When fewer people donate blood, even small disruptions to blood donations — like the nearly 7,000-unit shortfall in blood donations between Christmas and New Year’s Day — can have dramatic consequences for those in need of emergency blood transfusions.
As thanks for helping us end this emergency blood shortage, you’ll get a $20 Amazon.com Gift Card** by email* when you come to donate in February.
Blood cannot be manufactured or stockpiled and all blood types are urgently needed to ensure patient care isn’t postponed. Will you step up to help folks in your community and beyond? Make your appointment now!
https://www.redcrossblood.org/give.html/find-drive
Info about donating can be found at:https://marydonahue.org/blood-donation-faqs
Adjournment
Mary Donahue motioned, LK Sengupta seconded, to adjourn, no objection.
Attendance
In person
Erik Woodbury, Patty Guitron, So Kam Lee
Mary Donahue, Carmen Lizardi-Folley, Vernon Gallegos, Kevin Glapion, Elsa Jimenez-Samayoa, Rusty Johnson, Sherwin Mendoza, Anna Nguyen, Mary Pape, Christian Rodriguez, Jayanti Roy, Lakshmikanta "LK" Sengupta, Ravjeet Singh, James Tallent, Felisa Vilaubi, Glynn Wallis, Catherina Wong, *Lydia Wong
Online
Mirsaeid Abolghasemi, *Deborah Armstrong, Shagun Kaur, Cecilia Hui, Lauren Gordon, Mark Landefeld
Absent
Cheryl Balm, Sheldon Fields, Lisa Mesh, Liliana Rivera, Li Wei Sun
Meeting URL: https://fhda-edu.zoom.us/j/83439477181?pwd=XIIaaHHSOgnk34hqixqxaXY0EwQOPU.1
Meeting ID: 834 3947 7181
Passcode: 996594
Member | Remote Location | In District? |
Mary Donahue (PT) | MLC 243, 21250 Stevens Creek Blvd, Cupertino, CA 95014 | Yes |
Mark Landefeld (PE & Athletics) | PE 51a, 21250 Stevens Creek Blvd, Cupertino, CA 95014 | Yes |
Mirsaeid Abolghasemi | 101 W.Weddell Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94089 | Yes |
Lauren Gordon | F31G, 21250 Stevens Creek Blvd, Cupertino, CA 95014 | Yes |
Cecilia Hui | 1230 S Blaney Ave, San Jose, CA 95129 | Yes |
Shagun Kaur | F-31H 21250 Stevens Creek Blvd, Cupertino, CA 95014 | Yes |
Sheldon Fields | 1201 South Main St, Milpitas, CA 95035 | No |